DOJ Scrutinizes Netflix’s $72B Warner Bid Over Creator Leverage

The Justice Department’s expanding probe into Netflix’s proposed $72 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) marks a significant shift in antitrust enforcement, moving beyond consumer price concerns to the concept of monopsony power. By scrutinizing how the streaming giant treats filmmakers and content creators, regulators are signaling that the consolidation of the creator economy is now a primary concern for the U.S. government. This investigation focuses on whether a combined Netflix-Warner entity would possess such overwhelming market share that it could unilaterally dictate terms to independent producers, effectively stifling the very creative pipeline that fuels the streaming industry.

This move follows a precedent set by the DOJ’s successful block of the Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster merger, which was also predicated on the harm to authors rather than readers. In the context of SaaS and Cloud-native media, Netflix’s dominance is not just about its library, but its sophisticated data-driven recommendation engines and its global content delivery network (CDN). By absorbing WBD’s massive library—including HBO, CNN, and the Warner Bros. film studio—Netflix would not only gain content but also an unprecedented amount of consumer data to feed its machine learning models. The DOJ is concerned that this data advantage, combined with a reduced number of high-budget buyers, leaves filmmakers with little to no leverage in negotiations for residuals, creative control, and backend participation.

“

The Justice Department’s expanding probe into Netflix’s proposed $72 billion acquisition of Warner Bros.

From a market perspective, the $72 billion price tag reflects the high stakes of the streaming wars endgame. Netflix has long transitioned from a tech platform to a vertically integrated studio, but the WBD acquisition would represent its largest leap into legacy media. For the Cloud and SaaS sector, this deal highlights the convergence of infrastructure and content. Netflix’s proprietary Open Connect CDN and its heavy reliance on AWS for its control plane have set the standard for cloud-native entertainment. Integrating WBD’s legacy infrastructure into this modern stack would be a massive technical undertaking, potentially setting a new benchmark for media-cloud integrations.

However, the regulatory headwinds are stiff. The DOJ’s focus on creator leverage suggests that even if Netflix argues the deal is good for consumers by offering more content for a single subscription price, the impact on the supply side—the writers, directors, and actors—could be the deal's undoing. Industry analysts are watching closely to see if the DOJ will demand divestitures, such as the Warner Bros. film studio or specific cable networks, to mitigate this perceived monopsony power. If the deal is blocked, it could signal the end of the era of massive media consolidation, forcing companies like Netflix to rely more on organic growth and smaller, tactical acquisitions rather than industry-altering mega-mergers.

The short-term consequences for Netflix and WBD are already being felt in the markets, with uncertainty surrounding the deal’s closing timeline. Long-term, this probe could redefine the relationship between tech platforms and the talent that populates them. As Netflix continues to refine its ad-supported tiers and live-streaming capabilities, its need for a constant stream of high-quality content only grows. If the DOJ limits its ability to acquire that content through consolidation, Netflix may have to pivot its strategy toward more aggressive internal production or innovative revenue-sharing models with creators to maintain its competitive edge in an increasingly crowded cloud-streaming landscape.