Market Trends Neutral 6

Wall Street Analysts Warn of AI Bubble, Urge Pivot to Undervalued SaaS Stocks

Benchmark's Bill Gurley and NYU Professor Scott Galloway are warning of a potential bubble in AI infrastructure, suggesting that the market has unfairly punished SaaS valuations. They argue that established software leaders like ServiceNow and Salesforce are now prime targets for investors as the industry shifts from hardware build-outs to agentic AI applications.

· 3 min read ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • Benchmark's Bill Gurley and NYU Professor Scott Galloway are warning of a potential bubble in AI infrastructure, suggesting that the market has unfairly punished SaaS valuations.
  • They argue that established software leaders like ServiceNow and Salesforce are now prime targets for investors as the industry shifts from hardware build-outs to agentic AI applications.

Mentioned

Bill Gurley person Scott Galloway person ServiceNow company NOW Salesforce company CRM Workday company WDAY UiPath company PATH Informatica company

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Benchmark's Bill Gurley warns of an AI infrastructure bubble involving chips and data centers.
  2. 2NYU Professor Scott Galloway believes SaaS stock fears are overblown and represents a buying opportunity.
  3. 3ServiceNow (NOW) is down approximately 25% YTD despite maintaining 20%+ revenue growth.
  4. 4Salesforce (CRM) is trading at a forward P/E ratio below 15x, a historical low for the company.
  5. 5Salesforce targets a 10% annual revenue growth rate through the year 2030.
  6. 6ServiceNow is positioning its 'Tower control' product as an orchestration layer for agentic AI.
Metric
YTD Stock Performance -25% -25%
Revenue Growth 20%+ 10%+
Forward P/E Ratio 28x <15x
Forward P/S Ratio 7.5x <4x
Core AI Strategy Agentic Orchestration Data 360 & Master Record

Who's Affected

ServiceNow
companyPositive
Salesforce
companyPositive
AI Infrastructure Providers
technologyNegative
Workday
companyPositive

Analysis

The narrative surrounding the artificial intelligence boom is beginning to shift from the hardware that powers it to the software that must eventually justify the massive capital expenditures. Benchmark general partner Bill Gurley recently signaled a warning on CNBC, cautioning investors about a potential 'AI infrastructure bubble.' Gurley’s thesis rests on the idea that the market has over-indexed on the physical layer of AI—chips, servers, and data centers—while neglecting the software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies that will ultimately serve as the orchestration layer for AI agents. This sentiment was echoed by NYU Professor Scott Galloway, who suggested that the recent sell-off in SaaS stocks has been overdone, creating a rare value opportunity in high-quality software names.

For much of the past year, SaaS stocks have faced significant headwinds as enterprise budgets were diverted toward experimental AI projects and hardware procurement. This 'crowding out' effect led to a sharp contraction in multiples for industry stalwarts. However, the bull case for SaaS in an AI-driven world is built on the concept of the 'system of record.' Companies like ServiceNow and Salesforce hold the critical data that AI models require to function accurately in a corporate environment. Without the structured data managed by these platforms, AI agents are prone to hallucinations and lack the context necessary to perform complex business tasks. This data moat makes established SaaS providers nearly impossible to replicate or replace, even by the most advanced generative models.

Despite its stock being down nearly 25% year to date, the company continues to maintain revenue growth exceeding 20%.

ServiceNow serves as a primary example of this resilience. Despite its stock being down nearly 25% year to date, the company continues to maintain revenue growth exceeding 20%. Its recent launch of the 'Tower control' product signals a strategic move to become the orchestration layer for agentic AI, allowing enterprises to manage multiple AI agents across different departments. By trading at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 28 times—relatively modest for a high-growth software leader—ServiceNow represents a bet on the long-term utility of automated workflows.

What to Watch

Salesforce presents an even more aggressive value play. The company has aggressively integrated its 'Data 360' platform to pull information from disparate cloud providers and data warehouses, effectively positioning itself as the master of records for customer data. Following its acquisition of Informatica, Salesforce now possesses the technical plumbing to access legacy systems that were previously siloed. With the stock trading at a forward P/E of below 15 times and a forward price-to-sales multiple under 4, Salesforce is priced more like a legacy industrial firm than a high-tech innovator, despite its 10% annual revenue growth target through 2030.

Investors should watch for a 'great rotation' in the coming quarters. As the initial excitement over AI infrastructure matures into a demand for tangible ROI, the focus will inevitably return to the application layer. The primary risk remains the speed at which these SaaS giants can monetize their AI features. While the infrastructure layer has seen immediate revenue gains, the software layer is still in the early stages of proving that AI agents can drive significant upsells or seat-price increases. However, if Gurley and Galloway are correct, the current valuation gap between AI hardware and AI software represents one of the most significant mispricings in the current market cycle.

Cite This Page

"Wall Street Analysts Warn of AI Bubble, Urge Pivot to Undervalued SaaS Stocks." SaaS Intelligence Brief, March 22, 2026. https://getsaasbrief.com/story/ai-bubble-warning-saas-pivot-gurley-galloway

From the Network

How we covered this story

Every story in our saas coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the saas space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.